Centralization Strikes Again - April 2022 Edition
“Censorship is a fatal error, as it destroys the means of error correction.” — Naval Ravikant
Timeline
Apr 3 - Trezor verifies that email marketing service MailChimp had been hacked, where malicious attackers then targeted crypto users with phishing campaigns. Source
Apr 13 - The Wikimedia Foundation votes to stop accepting cryptocurrency donations to Wikipedia. Source
Apr 13 - Centralized crypto lending solution Celsius Network announces new accredited investor and custody rules for users based in the United States. Source
Apr 13 - Despite acting as central arbiter, Twitter fails to ban account impersonating Ethereum Name Service creator Nick Johnson. Source
Apr 14 - Virgil Griffith is sentenced to 5+ years in prison for his part in the Pyongyang Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Conference, North Korea in 2019. Source
Apr 14 - Elon Musk makes a $43B offer for social media giant Twitter. Source
Apr 14 - Coin Center files comment on an SEC rulemaking proposal, citing the misleading definition surrounding “exchange” as unconstitutional and infringing on First Amendment rights of open source developers. Source Source 2
Apr 15 - Tornado Cash reveals that it uses crypto investigation software Chainalysis to block sanctioned addresses from accessing its service. Source
Apr 15 - Reports surface of privacy-focused search engine DuckDuckGo removing search results for many popular pirate websites. Source
Apr 22 - Ethereum infrastructure provider Infura experiences a service outage, bringing down popular wallet app MetaMask for a majority of users. Source
Apr 22 - Binance freezes accounts of North Korean hackers involved with the March mega hack on blockchain gaming project Axie Infinity. Source
Apr 23 - Experimental game developer (and Twitter user @lazerwalker) reveals that Apple is removing her old games from the App Store due to lack of updates. Source
Apr 25 - Twitter accepts $44B bid offer from Elon Musk. Source
Apr 25 - Reports surface of decentralized exchange dYdX blocking users from sanctioned IP addresses. Source
Apr 26 - Open Markets Institute issues a statement requesting the Federal Communciations Commission (FCC), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and Department of Justice (DOJ) to block Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter. Source
Apr 27 cont’d - “The FCC will not entertain frivolous arguments.” Source
Apr 27 - The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announces the formation of a Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) to combat mis/disinformation. Source
Apr 28 - Twitter suspends account of Aave founder Stani Kulechov after impersonating (in jest) as the interim Twitter CEO. Source
Apr 30 - Block production on Solana comes to a halt after an enormous amount of inbound transactions (4mil per second) flooded the network. Source
Op-Ed
If you are interested in contributing to this OpEd, please reach out on Twitter @haochizzle, Telegram @haochizzle, or email tim.ho@chainsafe.io. We’d love to hear from you!
The views expressed are those of the author’s and do not reflect those of ChainSafe’s.
Mechanisms for Coordination
A core web3 and game theory concept I have recently fallen in love with is the idea of coordination games. I have to accredit this to Kevin Owocki and his excellent Green Pill manifesto, which deeply embeds into the reader’s conscience the idea of regenerative cryptoeconomics - that is, how to leverage blockchain-based technologies in order to coordinate for the regeneration of capital assets and solve for issues like the Tragedy of the Commons and the free-rider problem on public goods.
The more I have internalized and thought about the concept, the more the meme has stuck with me in my head.
It really is coordination games all the way down.
To quickly define per Wikipedia, a coordination game describes a “situation where a player will earn a higher payoff when he selects the same course of action as another player”. The most famous example of this is the prisoner’s dilemma.
The crux of human thriving is sourced from coordination - bartering, money, markets, resource utilization and allocation, governance at the familial/local/state/national/global levels. Conversely, coordination failures lead to war, famine, societal collapse, strife between family members, partisanism, and so on.
For the past two-to-three hundred odd years, we have witnessed civilizational levels of coordination thanks to institutional and technological innovations brought on from the industrial age: from the nation state identity, to double-entry bookkeeping, to building a network of roadways connecting one urban centre to the next. Similarly, coordination games have brought us into the information age, where we have set humanity to the moon, laid fibre optic cables beneath titanical oceans, and produced vaccines that today help prevent diseases like smallpox, polio and tetanus.
Without doubt, some of these coordination activities have happened necessarily out of centralization. At scale, you can argue centralized coordination is efficient. But it is also the reason why, as Kevin Owocki suggests, zero-sum games like nuclear war have endured. What sane, rational individuals would choose to coordinate in a way that assures mutual destruction? What sane, rational individuals would coordinate to exploit our 1of1 ‘looks rare’ blue planet so that our future generations are left to fight for the scraps? All this for a lack of better coordination mechanisms!
Today, we have entities like Facebook and Google standing on the back of the once Open Internet and playing coordination games without the direct participation nor governance of the individuals they harvest from. Quixotically, they have managed to connect humans across the globe at such staggering pace our biological processors have scant ability to parse the immense amount of information filtering through our feeble brains. It is not surprising to surmise then that many current forms of centralized coordination games are failing humanity.
And yet, like a liberating salve, we were bestowed blockchains, cryptonetworks, and web3. We were gifted The Internet, and now we have been gifted The Internet of Money. Open source; transparent; abundantly clear incentive structures laid right into the bedrock of its code. While decentralized coordination games in web3 are still nascent, it has produced global-scale coordination amongst sovereign individuals the likes which we have never seen before. We must be careful stewards of this gift.
And while decentralized coordination can still be a bit of a pipe dream, it has always been a worthy ideal to strive for. It produced the thriving of the medieval and Enlightenment-era city states; the ideals of Greek democracy; and the constitution and its reverent amendments on liberty and civil rights.
Web3 presents the best chance we have at creating better coordination games than we have ever had before.
Game on.
If you have any feedback, please don't hesitate to send them my way, or reach out on my Twitter.
Learn more about ChainSafe by visiting our website, through our Medium, via Twitter, visiting the ChainSafe GitHub, or joining the conversation on our Discord.
❤️ Thank you for reading. If you find this newsletter valuable, we would appreciate your support if you shared it with your network :) ❤️